|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Click here for information on how to order reprints of this article. | |||||||||||||||||||
The Effect of Peritoneal Contamination of the Tensile Strength of Small and LargeBowel
Anastomosis* D. Cottam, MD A. Chendrasekhar, MD F. Raymond E.T. Burt, PhD D.W. Moorman, MD G.A. Timberlake, MD Departments of Surgery Education
and Trauma Iowa Methodist Medical
Center Des Moines, IA *This work was supported by the Iowa Health System,
Des Moines, Iowa. KEY WORDS: peritoneal contamination, tensile strength,
anastomosis
ABSTRACTBackground: Peritoneal contamination is
thought to be a contraindication to primary anastomoses for bowel laceration.
Recent trauma literature has suggested that primary anastomoses may be an
option in cases of limited contamination. We have previously shown that 12-hour
peritoneal contamination does not seem to affect the tensile strength of
primary anastomosis in a clinically relevant model of peritonitis. This study
evaluates the effects of 18-hour contamination on primary repair bowel
lacerations. Materials and
Methods: 20
Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into two groups: control rats (n = 10), and cecal ligation and puncture
rats (CLP; n = 10). After performing
a laparotomy with cecal manipulation (control) or CLP, the animals recovered
for 18 hours. A second laparotomy was then performed where the cecum was
resected and primarily anastomosed in animals with cecal ligation and puncture.
Mid-jejunum and mid-colon were divided and primarily repaired. All animals were
recovered and received postoperative fluid boluses, daily antibiotics, and free
access to food and water. The studied group received an additional dose of
antibiotic daily as well as a larger fluid bolus. On postoperative day 4, all
animals were euthanized and the anastomotic sites were resected and loaded onto
a tensiometer and pulled apart under dynamic tension. Peak load and tissue
tension were measured as the anastomoses were disrupted. Peak load and maximum
standard load were disrupted and calculated for each anastomosis. Then tissue
was sent for hydroxproline content analysis. Study animal values were compared
with control values using the student t-test Statistical significance threshold
was P < .05. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the control and study animals with regard to anastomotic strength of colon or small bowel. There was no statically significant difference between hydroxyproline content of colon between the two groups. Small bowel hydroxyproline levels, however, were significantly greater in the control group than in the study group (54% greater). Conclusion: Eighteen-hour peritoneal
contamination does not seem to adversely affect the tensile strength of large
and small bowel anastomosis in a clinically relevant rat model. INTRODUCTION Anastomotic strength with maintenance of luminal
integrity is a fundamental necessity to a successful outcome of bowel repair.1
Primary repair in a contaminated field was thought to be associated with
leakage from bowel anastomosis.1 For this reason, major surgical
textbooks have stated that primary repair has a very limited or no role in the
face of peritoneal contamination.2,3 Previous military experience
has suggested that the performance of a primary anastomoses in the face of
peritoneal contamination related to trauma was associated with a higher
mortality than performance of a colostomy.4 Recent experience with
civilian injuries has lead to a reevaluation and subsequent endorsement of the
primary anastomoses option with regard to trauma patients.4-7
Detailed basic science information regarding the effect of peritoneal
contamination on the tensile strength of anastomoses is lacking. We have
previously published data on the effect of 12-hour peritoneal contamination on
the tensile strength of primary bowel anastomosis.1 We found that
12-hour peritoneal contamination did not have any effect on hydroxyproline
levels or the tensile strength of primary anastomosis in either the large or
small bowel 4 days after surgery. The purpose of this study was to determine
the effect of 18-hour peritoneal contamination on hydroxyproline levels and
tensile strength of primary anastomosis 4 days after surgery. MATERIALS AND
METHODS This protocol was approved by our Institutional Laboratory Animal Utilization Committee. Animals were cared for in accordance with the current guidelines of the National Institutes of Health (Bethesda, MD). Twenty Sprague-Dawley rats were housed In individual cages in a 12:12-hour light:dark,
temperature-controlled environment and were allowed ad libitum access to
standard rat chow and water. Each animal was assigned to one of the two groups.
The groups were 18-hour cecal ligation and puncture (CLP; n = 10) or 18-hour control (n
= 10). Animals were anesthetized using 5 mg/kg Ketamine IM and 25 mg/kg
pentobarbital SQ. Individual weights were recorded (range, 300 to 400 g), then
each rat's abdomen was shaved and prepped with a betadine solution. A midline
incision was made and the cecum was identified. The study animals (CLP)
underwent division of an avascular band between the cecum and the terminal
ileum. The mobilized cecum was then ligated using ligature and doubly punctured
with an 18-gauge needle. Control animals underwent division of the avascular
band without subsequent CLP. All animals had the cecum returned to its anatomic
position, and the abdomen was closed. All animals were then allowed to recover
for 18 hours before a second laparotomy was performed. At the repeat
laparotomy, peritoneal cultures were taken, and the abdominal cavity was
irrigated with 30 cc warm normal saline. The CLP group had a partial cecectomy
to remove the source of peritoneal contamination. Next, the mid-descending
colon and the mid-jejunum were divided and re-anastomosed. Control animals
underwent the same operation with the exception of the partial cecectomy. All animals received
immediate postoperative doses of gentamicin (5 mg/kg IM) and ampicillin (75
mg/kg IM) followed by a warm saline subcutaneous fluid bolus. The study animals
also received an additional single postoperative dose of metronidazole (15
mg/kg IM). All animals recovered in the
controlled environment, were allowed free access to food and water, and
received three additional daily doses of gentamicin and ampicillin. On postoperative day 4, the
animals were sacrificed with an intramuscular and subsequent intracardiac
injection of beuthanasia. The abdomens were opened and anastomoses were
identified and resected 2 cm proximal and 2 cm distal to the suture line.
Specimens were gently flushed with iced normal saline and skeletonized free
from adherent tissues. Each piece was then loaded onto a tensiometer (United
Calibration Corporation, Des Moines, IA). The machine was zeroed before each
measurement, and load strain curves were produced. Maximum load for each
specimen was recorded. Immediately after the procedure, anastomotic specimens
were cleared of suture material, placed in individual containers, and frozen in
liquid nitrogen for hydroxyproline determination. Maximum standard load (g/cm2
body surface area) was calculated by dividing each individual peak load by the
animal's body surface area, thus allowing a comparison between different sized
animals. The average maximum standard load for each group, along with the
standard deviation of the mean, was then calculated. Hydroxyproline content was
determined via alkaline hydrolysis at the University of Osteopathic Medicine
and Health Sciences (Des Moines, IA) as described by Reddy and Enwemeka.8
The averaged values with the associated standard deviation of the mean were
calculated. Statistical analysis was
performed using the average values for the maximum standard load and
hydroxyproline content. Eighteen-hour CLP was compared with 18- hour controls
using the unpaired student's t-test. Statistical significance threshold was P < .05. RESULTS All animals survived to postoperative day 4. No
anastomotic leaks were noted, all control animals were culture negative, all
the study animals were culture positive with purulent peritonitis, and all
anastomotic segments failed at the anastomotic site during the disruption
procedure. The maximum standard load and hydroxyproline content are listed in
Table 1. There was no significant difference between the maximum anastomotic
standard load (P = .699 for small
bowel and P = .475 for colon). The
hydroxyproline content of the colon showed no significant difference between
the two groups (P = .142). However,
there was a statistically difference between the two groups hydroxyproline
content in the small bowel. The hydroxyproline content was 54% greater in the
control group than the study group. DISCUSSION Wound healing in the face of peritoneal soilage and
associated generalized peritonitis is the real issue addressed by this study.
Previous surgical thinking based on observational studies have led to the
assumption that wound healing is abnormal in the presence of peritonitis.4
Recent trauma literature, as well as our basic science experimental data, has
shown that primary anastomoses in early peritonitis is a viable option.4-7 Obviously, many factors go
into whether a primary anastomoses is feasible or whether an ostomy of some
sort should be performed. These include the presence of shock, gross appearance
of the viable bowel, and location and duration of peritoneal soilage. This
study was designed to assess the duration of peritoneal soilage with the
associated acute inflammatory response present at that time interval and its
effect on anastomotic strength and new collagen synthesis (hydroxyproline
levels) 4 days postoperatively. Our 4-day postoperative
course was chosen based on work done by Uden and Blomquist that demonstrated
that by postoperative day 4 the anastomotic strength in animals similar to our
controls had returned to initial values and an increase in hydroxyproline
content could be detected.9 This time frame also allowed comparison
with our own previous studies as well as a study by Ahrendt et al that studied
24-hour peritoneal contamination.10 Our previous data demonstrated
that short-term soilage for 12 hours does not significantly affect anastomotic
strength or hydroxyproline content (a standard indicator of new collagen
synthesis) in both colonic and small bowel anastomosis 4 days after surgery.
Ahrendt et al published their results on long-term peritoneal contamination,
which showed a significant decrease in new collagen synthesis after 24 hours of
peritoneal soilage in a similar rat model.10 Our current study,
which studied 18 hours, did not show a difference in anastomotic strength;
however, the hydroxyproline content was significantly lower in the small bowel
anastomoses of the study group compared with the control group. This may be the
transition period to the results seen by Ahrendt et al.10 Another
difference between our series of studies and the study published by Ahrendt et
al may be related to our protocol's use of antibiotics and irrigation, which
was not used by Ahrendt et al. Our protocol more accurately simulates the
clinical scenario. Other studies, including those by Irvin and Goligher, failed
to show that fecal soiling or peritoneal sepsis caused anastomotic
complications and cited the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics as a possible
reason.11 CONCLUSIONClearly, the understanding of the effect of
peritoneal soilage on primary bowel anastomoses is evolving. It is becoming
more accepted in certain patients, such as trauma patients as well as those
with diverticulitis, to perform resection and primary anastomoses even in the
face of peritoneal soilage. Our current study does show that the hydroxyproline
content starts dropping after 18 hours of contamination in small-bowel
anastomosis. However, the tensile strength is still not adversely affected.
More studies are needed to clearly understand the effects of peritoneal soilage
and how they can be altered using other medications and approaches such as
growth factors, fibrin glue, steroids, and antineoplastics. REFERENCES 1. Orlando
MD, Chandrasekhar A, Bundz S, et al: The effect of peritoneal contamination on wound strength of small bowel and
colonic anastomoses. Am Surg 65:673,
1999. 2.
Sabiston
D: Textbook of Surgery: The Biological
Basis of Modern Surgical Practice, ed 15. Philadelphia, WB Saunders Co,
1997, pp 989-990. 3.
Schwartz
SI: Principles of Surgery, ed 7. New
York, McGraw Hill Co, 1999, p 1280. 4.
Fabian
TC, Croce MA: Small and large bowel injuries, in Cameron JL (ed): Current Surgical Therapy, ed 6. St
Louis, MO, Mosby, 1998, pp 957-959. 5.
Ryan
MS: The effect of surrounding infection upon the healing of colonic wounds. Dis Colon Rectum 13:124-126, 1970. 6.
Gonzalez
RP, Merloth GJ, Holevar MR: Colostomy in penetrating colon injury: Is it
necessary? J Trauma 41:271-275, 1996. 7.
Ivatury
RR, Guadino J, Nallathambi MN, et al: Definitive treatment of colon injuries: A
prospective study. Am J Surg
59:43-49, 1993. 8.
Reddy
GK, Enwemeka CS: A simplified method for the analysis of hydroxyproline in
biological tissues. Clin BioChem
29:225-229, 1996. 9.
Uden
P, Blomquist P: Influence of proximal colostomy on the healing of a left
colonic anastomosis: An experimental study in the rat. Br J Surg 75:325-329, 1988. 10.
Ahrendt
GM, Tantry US, Barbul A: Intraabdominal sepsis impairs colonic reparative
collagen synthesis. Am J Surg
171:102-107, 1996. 11.
Irvin
TT, Goligher JC: Aetiology of disruption of intestinal anastomoses. Br J Surg 60:461-464, 1973. Table 1. Maximum Standard Load and
Hydroxyproline Content
| ||||||||||||||||||||
©2000-2013. All Rights Reserved. Veterinary Solutions LLC
|